|
|
Post by leftcom_bassist on Feb 20, 2016 1:40:04 GMT
i'm somewhat anti-gun. They're cool as shit but at the same time they're deadly weapons and i think that other non-lethal methods of self defence (stun guns, pepper spray etc) would still be effective in most circumstances. What do you guys think?
|
|
caspertheanarchist
LSA Member
The Friendly Cuck
A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years
Posts: 116 
|
Post by caspertheanarchist on Feb 20, 2016 3:05:10 GMT
People should have the right to own guns, however, because people shouldn't use force against each other, they would be needed only for sports and self defense.
|
|
|
|
Post by leftcom_bassist on Feb 20, 2016 3:30:26 GMT
i agree people should have the right to own guns and use them for sport/hunting and self defence, but i personally wouldn't use one for self defence because i don't think it's always nessesary to use lethal force to protect yourself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2016 6:40:55 GMT
I feel the people only need guns, until the state is overthrown and our initial society is created. We can keep them now as our main defense against the state, once our goal is accomplished though, I feel guns will also fade into the category as another unnecessary item
|
|
|
|
Post by leftcom_bassist on Feb 20, 2016 10:08:21 GMT
yeah i do think they are essential for the revolution to succeed
|
|
|
|
Post by Scandinavianpartisan on Feb 20, 2016 18:27:19 GMT
Idk about you liberals but I'll be keeping my guns.
|
|
AnarchyInTheUK
LSA Member
The most dangerous thing in this world is a fool with a cause. Especially if that fool is rich.
Posts: 46
|
Post by AnarchyInTheUK on Feb 21, 2016 2:32:19 GMT
I am Pro gun and that always makes me seem less leftist until I explain why. I used to be very Anti-Gun and thought the only excuse to be pro gun is "Guns are cool, I hate Obama how can I kill these Mexicans without my boomstick" But then as I started to gain more understanding of anarchy and started to get onboard with the necessity of revolution, Now I find it ridiculous that a governing body can take arms away from its people while that governing body is still allowed to have arms. So while I think that It would be ideal that people come to the conclusion that they no longer need guns after the power has been returned to the people instead of the minority, I dont think any government should have the ability to take them away from its people.
|
|
|
|
Post by LGBT Anarchist on Feb 21, 2016 17:16:29 GMT
Very pro gun. The people need the power to defend against the state or tyranny, and especially against possible counter-revolutionaries.
|
|
arakhion
LSA Member
Anarcho-Bipolarism
Status updates are a thing
Posts: 73
|
Post by arakhion on Feb 22, 2016 3:28:11 GMT
I strongly oppose banning anything, as it doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
Post by rumpleforeskin on Feb 22, 2016 6:40:08 GMT
I am Pro gun and that always makes me seem less leftist until I explain why. I used to be very Anti-Gun and thought the only excuse to be pro gun is "Guns are cool, I hate Obama how can I kill these Mexicans without my boomstick" But then as I started to gain more understanding of anarchy and started to get onboard with the necessity of revolution, Now I find it ridiculous that a governing body can take arms away from its people while that governing body is still allowed to have arms. So while I think that It would be ideal that people come to the conclusion that they no longer need guns after the power has been returned to the people instead of the minority, I dont think any government should have the ability to take them away from its people. AUTISTIC |
|
|
|
Post by leftcom_bassist on Feb 22, 2016 8:44:54 GMT
it would be hard for me and my fellow Aussie comrades to revolt as guns were heavily restricted after the port author massacre in 96.
|
|
AnarchyInTheUK
LSA Member
The most dangerous thing in this world is a fool with a cause. Especially if that fool is rich.
Posts: 46
|
Post by AnarchyInTheUK on Feb 22, 2016 23:48:39 GMT
I am Pro gun and that always makes me seem less leftist until I explain why. I used to be very Anti-Gun and thought the only excuse to be pro gun is "Guns are cool, I hate Obama how can I kill these Mexicans without my boomstick" But then as I started to gain more understanding of anarchy and started to get onboard with the necessity of revolution, Now I find it ridiculous that a governing body can take arms away from its people while that governing body is still allowed to have arms. So while I think that It would be ideal that people come to the conclusion that they no longer need guns after the power has been returned to the people instead of the minority, I dont think any government should have the ability to take them away from its people. AUTISTIC Slightly. I just don't like it people touch my ears. |
|
|
|
Post by joshuadery69 on Feb 24, 2016 0:20:55 GMT
I'm very pro-gun, they are a very essential tool for revolution and the overthrow of capitalism and the state, and also a great way for self-defense.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jasper DarkHand on Feb 25, 2016 7:48:57 GMT
I am Pro gun and that always makes me seem less leftist until I explain why. I used to be very Anti-Gun and thought the only excuse to be pro gun is "Guns are cool, I hate Obama how can I kill these Mexicans without my boomstick" But then as I started to gain more understanding of anarchy and started to get onboard with the necessity of revolution, Now I find it ridiculous that a governing body can take arms away from its people while that governing body is still allowed to have arms. So while I think that It would be ideal that people come to the conclusion that they no longer need guns after the power has been returned to the people instead of the minority, I dont think any government should have the ability to take them away from its people. It would only make you seem less leftist if you equate liberal progressivism with the left. American liberals are not leftist. The true left is traditionally pro-gun. |
|
AnarchyInTheUK
LSA Member
The most dangerous thing in this world is a fool with a cause. Especially if that fool is rich.
Posts: 46
|
Post by AnarchyInTheUK on Feb 25, 2016 23:52:17 GMT
I am Pro gun and that always makes me seem less leftist until I explain why. I used to be very Anti-Gun and thought the only excuse to be pro gun is "Guns are cool, I hate Obama how can I kill these Mexicans without my boomstick" But then as I started to gain more understanding of anarchy and started to get onboard with the necessity of revolution, Now I find it ridiculous that a governing body can take arms away from its people while that governing body is still allowed to have arms. So while I think that It would be ideal that people come to the conclusion that they no longer need guns after the power has been returned to the people instead of the minority, I dont think any government should have the ability to take them away from its people. It would only make you seem less leftist if you equate liberal progressivism with the left. American liberals are not leftist. The true left is traditionally pro-gun. I know but the general American public dosnt know what the true left views are |
|
